Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

23. According to the proj;ect__pro_--oone:n_';f;. it i\io.3438/20 10 objection statem--.en:i_" is:
effect:
The petitioners had 'eariier 'flied'".\.é%ritV'}oeVtitioneit raising the same con_tentito'ns'V;'j'\}i;i'i=e.i_eh "ha've"jreached finality in CA. Nos£3492¥'9+<§f,?O:§t'§..v"fRefherefore the petitione.i.ua4:e.v barred judicata and 'implement the project. to be understood in c_o*nte$<~tua:i'i5ab_ekgr'ound in which the earlier judgments» With the change of Goviernirnent'-»in'"the'V'ye'ar 2004, the new Government too'i~'iV.u";5:* etandvthat Government had acquired iands requirement for the BMIC project. interest iitigation.

7)2'sec 1996 sec 405, 3)1 scc %Vh.iai?~e sought for dismissal of the petitions Co'n__tenciinvo_i'.r*tVhat the present petitioners have no locus standi.iHto Challenge. Therefore the petitions have to be "Edi_s.riA.:issed. They also contend that in the earlier round litigation, acquisition in favour of these respondents was never questioned and the tends given to them is nothing to do with the lands notified for BMIC project, The lands acquired by these respondents arei..arl¥».rffieraVdy improved. The original land owners questioned the acquisition. __yTherefore""--:t'he"=sarn-ed"

Government Order dated 20.1i_.19'9S:"arid' this Court and the Apex f;iouurt In this context, they took Hu"sV',v:thVVrou'g'i: details of survey numbers ndatter of various correspondenloevisob.s_equeh:t'AAto'._2~~9.7.1997. We have gone ;_~it'i'ri'ro.'ugh:=A._ tlfigerireeo'rd--s..'...$§ubrnitted by the Governme%nt"::asd\}v':e.iit idoounfients relied upon by the pert'itirori§:ifs. "

took us through the coryr;fesp.onden<:e'" to indicate that several Sands b.eliong'ing_""'«t.o simiiarly placed persons have been acquisition by notification, but they have n__ot-djienotified the lands of the petitioners though theirula.-nds are not required for any of the components tithe BMIC project as envisaged under FWA. Therefore according to therrigt:iiAe'"inot--if'i'caVtion{s'for acquisition of iand deserve-._to-...be cit;ashed.v

4.4l';l.S{.l:b~sequently, on 3.4.1997 the Frame Work A.c.;"reeh"ie.hit Vlkihown as FWA was entered into between the Go§'e.rh.me'nt of Karnetaka and Nahcli Infrastructure Cor_ridet' Enterprises Ltd. (NICE). The NICE came into ";e>'<*;steh<:e for implementing the BMIC project. The «details how the project has to be developed. éncludlng the outer peripheral road as implementation of the project igienveraiiyrr:iesVe.ri'b'edvi~ih the scheduie were centempiated"%.n:ih.e * ' V POINT NOS 1 81 2 :