Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

32. Mr. Sikri had also drawn the attention of this Court to the material examined by the Arbitral Tribunal. He had submitted that the Certificate of the Independent Engineer which was relied upon by the Arbitral Tribunal was not signed by the person who had purportedly carried out the inspection. The said Certificate enclosed along with the documents was an unsigned Certificate. He pointed out that the signed Certificate had been produced during the course of examination of CW2 (Mr. Amit Zutshi) but it was not signed by the person who had carried out the inspection. He submitted that the Arbitral Tribunal could not rely on any document which had two versions as it was clear that the same had been manufactured.