Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: ejectment execution in Khem Chand And Others vs Parveen Bala on 3 October, 2012Matching Fragments
Objectors Khem Chand and his sisters Pemmi Devi and Veena Devi have filed this execiton second appeal having failed in both the courts below.
This case illustrates how execution of orders passed by the courts is delayed or frustrated by vested interest.
In the instant case, ejectment petition filed by respondent Parveen Bala under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 on the ground of personal necessity was allowed by the appellate authority against Madan Lal tenant. Civil Revision No. 7308 of 2009 filed by Madan Lal was dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 28.5.2010, Annexure R/7. Thereupon, respondent-landlady filed execution petition for execution of the ejectment order.
For the reasons aforesaid, I find that the instant second appeal is not only meritless but is completely frivolous. The same deserves to be dismissed with heavy costs so as to curb such frivolous litigation. By filing frivolous and meritless objections, the appellants have delayed the execution of ejectment order by at least two years although the ejectment order had attained finality with dismissal of CR No. 7308 of 2009.
Accordingly, the instant second appeal is dismissed with costs of ` 10,000/- to be paid by the appellants to the respondent-decree holder.