Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

5. This Court is not going into the merits or otherwise of the allegations made by the 5th respondent. This Court in WP No.3213 of 2015 by following the judgments of Madras High Court in S.MARTIN vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE1 and Delhi High Court in SUMER SINGH SALKAN, COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION RE vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR2 held that the petitioner can be permitted to move the concerned Court for withdrawal of look out circular by stating the facts. For the reasons alike and following the order passed in the WP No.3213 of 2015, this writ petition is disposed of. It is open for the petitioner to file a petition to recall the Look-Out Circular issued against her before the Court concerned and on filing such a petition, the trial Court shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders for recalling the Look Out Circular by taking into consideration 2014 LAW SUIT (Madras) 250 2010 LAW SUIT (Delhi) 1628 the facts and circumstances of the case, as expeditiously as possible. The petitioner is also directed to co-operate with the investigating agency. It is needless to observe that the respondents 3 and 4 shall follow the guidelines issued in ARNESH KUMAR vs. STATE OF BIHAR3 case. As a sequel to the disposal of the writ petition, miscellaneous petitions if any pending shall also stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.