Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

We have seen provisions in section 5, 52, 51 and 36, in that order. It appears prima facie, the Tribunal lost sight of contention of petitioner in saying that the leasehold is not wakf property. Section 36 provides for registration of wakf property, section 51 for alienation and section 52 for recovery. We have not been able to find and naturally so, there is finding in impugned order that the leasehold is wakf property, unlawfully alienated. On the contrary the question formulated is for determination whether the suit land is wakf property or not. Alienation // 3 // of wakf property is to be made per provision in section 51. If it is not wakf property, the Act does not apply.