Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

9. During cross examination he deposed that he arrested the accused on 20.02.2002 vide arrest memo but admitted that he did not remember who was the witness cited in the said case. He admitted that he never examined FIR No. 303/01 PS-Lajpat Nagar State Vs. Saroj Kumar Jha & Ors. 7/11 K.S. Jaswal in the pending cases as he was already examined by the previous IO. He filed the supplementary challan against the accused Saroj Jha and other accused vide supplementary challan in the month of April, 2002. He admitted that after getting the record from office of ROC Bombay and on its perusal he was sure that accused Saroj Jha was not having any status in the said company. He admitted that he procured the documents from the office of Sub- Registrar only after the arrest of Sayed Mohd. perhaps in the month of July, 2003. He admitted that he did not interrogate or made any inquiry from any witness with regard to the role of accused Saroj Jha and even did not file any document on record against accused Saroj Jha. He denied the suggestion that he was deposing falsely being a prosecution witness. He also denied the suggestion that he falsely implicated the accused Saroj Jha in the present case and when he was arrested in this case, he was already in custody in some other case. He admitted that he was aware that accused was involved in some other cases also and accused was arrested in different cases on different dates. He also admitted that he had not recorded the statement of A.S. Jaswal or the complainant of present case.