Document Fragment View
Matching Fragments
6. Prom the principles laid down by the Privy Council in the cases reported in Banarsi Prosad v. Kashikrishna Narain, 28 all. 227; Badhakrishna Aiyar v. Swaminatha Aiyar A.I.R. (8) 1921 PC. 25 & Ernest Hugh Canning v. Soobrarn Pariah A.I.R. (28) 1941 P.C. 106 & accepted by the Federal Court in Moolji Jaitha & Co v. Khandesh Spinning if Weaving Mills Co. Ltd., A. 1. R. (37) 1950 F. C. 83 as to the special circumstances that must exist for granting certificates under Section 109(e), C. P. Code, or from the conditions prescribed in Article 133(1)(c) of the Constitution of India for appeals to the Supreme Court in civil matters, it would not be right to extract a rule as to the circumstances in which a case should be certified under Article 134(o) as a fit one for appeal to the Supreme Court, but, semble the circumstances need to be very special indeed. For the purposes of the present case it is sufficient to say that a case cannot be certified under Article 134(1)(c) as a fit one for appeal to the Supreme Court, if injustice of a serious & substantial character has not occurred to the petitioner & if the case does not involve such a substantial question of law as breason of the question not being well settled or by reason of there being a conflict of existing authorities as to the principle of law involved, requires an authoritative decision of the highest Court in the land.