Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Psychiatric evaluation in Krishan Gupta vs . Mohit & Ors. on 23 September, 2019Matching Fragments
1. (I) Expenditure on treatment : As per Rs. 7,000/ Ex.CW1/16, Ex.CW1/17, Ex.CW1/18 and Ex.CW1/21, there are medical bills worth Rs. 7,000/ on record. Thus, petitioner is awarded a sum of Rs. 7,000/ under this head.
(ii) Expenditure on Conveyance : The Rs. 50,000/ petitioner has not filed any bill for conveyance. However, as per Ex.CW2/1, petitioner Krishan was examined by the Disability Medical Board for Neurological disability at IHBAS on 30.07.2018. As per report, patient is a case of significant personality change following head injury due to Road Traffic Accident on 22.11.2013. On evaluation of psychiatric disability with Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale, he has scored 12/20, showing 4070% of disability which is not likely to improve. By guess work, compensation can be awarded for conveyance.
(iii) Expenditure on special diet : The Rs.50,000/ petitioner has not filed any bill for conveyance. As per Ex.CW2/1, petitioner Krishan was examined by the Disability Medical Board for Neurological disability at IHBAS on 30.07.2018. As per report, patient is a case of significant personality change following head injury due to Road Traffic Accident on 22.11.2013. On evaluation of psychiatric disability with Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale, he has scored 12/20, showing 4070% of disability which is not likely to improve. By guess work, compensation can be awarded for special diet.
(iv) Cost of nursing / attendant : As per Rs.50,000/ Ex.CW2/1, petitioner Krishan was examined by the Disability Medical Board for Neurological disability at IHBAS on 30.07.2018. As per report, patient is a case of significant personality change following head injury due to Road Traffic Accident on 22.11.2013. On evaluation of psychiatric disability with Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale, he has scored 12/20, showing 4070% of disability which is not likely to improve. Even in the absence of documentary proof, compensation for attendant's charges is to be given even if services were rendered by family members.
(ii) Loss of amenities or loss of Already covered expectation of life span on account of disability :
(iii) Percentage of loss of earning 60% capacity in relation to disability:
As per Ex.CW2/1, petitioner Krishan was examined by the Disability Medical Board for Neurological disability at IHBAS on 30.07.2018. As per report, patient is a case of significant personality change following head injury due to Road Traffic Accident on 22.11.2013. On evaluation of psychiatric disability with Indian Disability Evaluation and Assessment Scale, he has scored 12/20, showing 4070% of disability which is not likely to improve. Having regard to the nature of work performed by injured before the accident his future income is directly affected due to this physical disability. During Petitioner's Evidence, Dr. Vijender Singh, Psychiatric, IHBAS examined himself as CW2 and he made opinion that disability can be roughly taken as 60% in this case.