Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

52. It is the case of the defendant nos. 1 and 2 in the affidavit in reply that each and every statement made in the press release is based on their honest belief and on the facts verified from the documents which they had received under the provisions of Right to Information Act. The defendant no.1 had approached various government bodies and agencies and prima facie violations were emerging on the basis of the findings from documents procured under RTI. It is also the case of the defendant no.1 that there were about 8 journalist from different channel of Zee Media present in the said press conference to counter and embarrass the defendant no.1 and has repeatedly made attempts not to allow other media persons to ask him questions. The officials of the plaintiffs were also present at the press conference venue and distributed their statement to the attending journalists from various media houses. A perusal of the rejoinder on this issue indicates that except bare denial, the plaintiffs have not raised any specific plea. The defendant no.1 also has averred that copy of the website at Ex.F is the copy of the introduction of the plaintiffs from its website and copies of other documents at page 130 and 131 are the copies of the website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs which information is in public domain and cannot be defamatory. It is also the case of the defendant no.1 Kvm NMS1086.14 that he had approached the media house including Zee TV prior to holding press conference in respect of the said issue amongst other issues. Reporter of the plaintiffs also was present and participated.