Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

7. Petitioner though did not respond to the aforesaid show cause notice, he did send one communication, subsequently, informing the respondents that matter was pending in the High Court of Judicature at Nainital and was likely to be finalized very soon as the matter had been compromised.

8. On 02.03.2016, the impugned order was issued by the respondents terminating the services of the petitioner with immediate effect under Rule 22 of the Indo-Tibetan Border Police Rules 1994 (ITBP Rules) read with Section 11 of Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Act 1992 (ITBP Act).