Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

[iii] In the month of May, 2012 Sharad made telephonic call to Non-Applicant No.3, thereby, intimating her that public notice (tkghj izdV.k) is published in daily Marathi newspaper 3/8 cri.appln. 4354.13 (04.03.14). FINAL.sxw "Divya Marathi" dated 27th April, 2012 in respect of the property owned by Non-Applicant No.3. It was intimated to her that, in the said public notice, it is mentioned that, she has entered into an agreement to sale (fodzhpk djkjukek @ bZlkj ikorh ) the said property to one Gopal Suryakant Waghmare and, therefore, said Waghmare has called the objections to the said Isar-pawati. Said notice is given by one Advocate Sampatrao Pukhraj Deoda. On receipt of this shocking information, Non-Applicant No.3 immediately contacted with the brother-in-law, who is Advocate by profession at Aurangabad and apprised him about the said public notice. According to the First Information Report, her brother-in-law intimated to her on telephone that he has obtained photostat copy of said fabricated and bogus Isar-pawati made in her name and it was informed that in the said document though name of Non-Applicant No.3 is appearing however, she is shown as widow and resident of village Kautha, Tal.&Dist. Nanded. Said "Isar-Pawati" dated 2nd April, 2012 is executed on the stamp paper of Rs.100/-. Said document is notarized one. In the said "Isar-Pawati" it has been stated that, Non- Applicant No.3 has agreed to sell the property for consideration of Rs.38 Lakhs to one Gopal Waghmare r/o Ramnagar, Telangi Lane, Jalana and out of the agreed sale consideration, she has received an amount of Rs.11 Lakhs, in cash. As per the said "Isar-Pawati" remaining amount was to be paid within a period of three months i.e. before 27th June, 2012.

[iv] On getting this information, NA No.3 came to India on 10th October, 2012 and met to her brother-in-law on 14th 4/8 cri.appln. 4354.13 (04.03.14). FINAL.sxw October, 2012. He showed said alleged "Isar-Pawati" to her. On perusal of the same, Non-Applicant No.3 found that, said "Isar-Pawati" is bogus and fabricated one. She has further stated in the First Information Report that, Advocate S.P. Deoda never made any contact with her. She also expressed that, present Applicant in collusion with other accused has prepared said bogus and fabricated "Isar-Pawati".

[6] Perusal of the entire First Information Report does not ascribe any positive act in preparation of said bogus and fabricated "Isar-Pawati".

Curiously, there are no allegations and/or statement made in the First Information Report that it is the Applicant, who was knowing that the said "Isar-Pawati" is bogus and / or fabricated one. A general statement is made in the First Information Report that the present Applicant in collusion with other persons, who are shown as accused in the said First Information Report, has prepared the said "Isar-Pawati".