Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Inditrade Derivatives And Commodities ... vs Klio Financial Services on 22 July, 2020

Bench: C.T.Ravikumar, K.Haripal

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM


                             PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR

                                &

              THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.HARIPAL

 WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2020 / 31ST ASHADHA, 1942

                       Arb.A.No.17 OF 2020

  AGAINST THE ORDER IN OPARB 722/2012 DATED 20-12-2019 OF
      COURT OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-V, ERNAKULAM

APPELLANT:

              INDITRADE DERIVATIVES AND COMMODITIES LIMITED
              (FORMERLY M/S.JRG WEALTH MANAGEMENT LTD.),
              FIRST FLOOR, MES BUILDING, KALOOR,
              COCHIN-682017, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED
              SIGNATORY, MR.SARATH K., DEPUTY MANAGER -LEGAL

              BY ADVS.
                     SRI.JOSEPH MARKOSE (SR.)
                     SRI.TERRY V.JAMES
                     SRI.SHARAN SHAHIER
                     SRI.MATHEWS K.UTHUPPACHAN

RESPONDENT:

              KLIO FINANCIAL SERVICES
              NO.816, 10TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
              BANGALORE-560034, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR-
              GEORGE KOSHY.

              BY ADV. SRI.G.SHRIKUMAR (SR.)
              BY ADV. SRI.ANESH PAUL

     THIS ARBITRATION APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 22.07.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
 Arb.A.17/2020                       2



                            JUDGMENT

Ravikumar, J.

This appeal, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is filed against order dated 20.12.2019 in O.P. (Arb) No.722 of 2012 of the Additional District Court-V, Ernakulam. When this matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel on both sides submitted that the parties have amicably settled the issues out of Court. The learned counsel for the appellant further submitted that the appellant, therefore, does not wish to pursue with the appeal any further. In fact, a memo has been filed in that regard. In terms of the said memo and recording the aforesaid fact, this appeal is closed.

Sd/-

C.T.RAVIKUMAR JUDGE Sd/-

K.HARIPAL JUDGE Arb.A.17/2020 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

ANNEXURE A1 TRUE COPY OF THE STRATEGIC BUSINESS ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT DATED 27.11.2005.
ANNEXURE A2 TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD OF THE ARBITRATOR DATED 16.6.2012.
spc/