Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

22. It was alleged that the petitioner is a part of the racket spreading in Delhi and Haryana and has suppressed this fact. The UOI‟s Counsel submits that that on the 4th of October 2017, the petitioner was caught red handed by the joint team of Delhi and Haryana. The Counsel alleged that unregistered ultra sound machines and money given by the pregnant lady was also recovered from the petitioner‟s pocket. The Counsel explaining the incident submitted that the racket was initially intercepted by the authorities of Haryana and the Delhi authorities were intimated later. A criminal complaint was filed against the petitioner under section 3, 4, 5(2), 6, 29, 23, 25, 27 of the Act and under Rule 9(4), 10 (1A), 18 and a FIR no. 0105 dated 05.10.2017 was also filed. Further, the counsel alleged that the petitioner was also running a clinic at Chittaranjan Park illegally. Therefore, the grievance of the petitioner that he is not able to work is false as he was illegally running his clinic his clinic in the basement. Also, the petitioner was working as a Radiologist with Dr. Mangala Telang, Dir. Fertility Research & IVF Centre and were caught on cameras by BBC sting operation as being involved in an illegal act of sex determination and aborting female foetus. It was argued, besides that the UOI justifiably rejected the petitioner‟s application dated 31.03.2010 and passed the order dated 11.10.2010 deferring the registration of his proposed clinic in the name of Dr. Puri‟s Ultrasound clinic at CR Park in view of the criminal case against him. Thereafter, another center asked for the approval of their center with the petitioner as radiologist but was rejected, on the ground that the petitioner has not been approved by the advisory committee. All these decisions were taken by the District Appropriate Authority, South East District after taking the advice of the District advisory committee as per law and taking note of the interests of public at large.