Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

In AIR 1929 Cal 28 (P), the plaintiff who was held to have purchased in execution of a money decree wanted to eject some of the heirs of the recorded tenants who were not party to the rent suit or the execution proceedings. In those circumstances it was held that the plaintiff having purchased only the right, title and interest of some of the co-sharer tenants was entitled to joint possession with the remaining tenants of the land. It was not case of rank trespasser as we find in the present suit. The facts of the present case are, however, different. The entire area was settled with the plaintiff by Mir Mehdi Hussain Who was in exclusive possession of the same.