Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

16 PW11 Inspector Mohit Kumar, CBI is the IO of the case. The arrest memo dated 15.09.2012 qua the accused is Ex PW11/A and the permission from the learned court in that regard is Ex PW11/B. He inter alia deposed that during the search at the residence of the accused, one e-ticket in respect of accused dated 03.09.2012 of Thai Royal Ticketing was recovered which is Ex PW11/C. The order dated 15.12.2012 of the court of learned ACMM (West) vide which de-sealing of the packet for the purpose of preparing an inventory of actual alleged currency notes with their relevant particulars was allowed has been proved as Ex PW11/D. He inter alia deposed that during the examination of the relevant witnesses it came on record that the discrepancy (regarding total number of notes) crept in the cause of human error. The sealed cover in which the expert report Ex PW9/E was received in the office of CBI from BNP, Dewas is Ex PW11/E. The charge sheet has been proved as Ex PW11/F. The FIR dated 13.09.2012 of this case is Ex PW11/G. The e-challan is Ex PW11/J and the hash value certificate is Ex PW11/H. 17 Statement of accused under section 313 Cr.P.C was recorded on 16.11.2016 by the learned predecessor of this court. In the said statement, the accused denied the material incriminating circumstances appearing in prosecution evidence on record against him. He inter alia stated that his statement was obtained under pressure by the customs officials. He stated that he had been falsely implicated in this case and the FICNs were planted upon him by the Custom officials. He preferred not to lead any defence evidence.