Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

law resulting in arbitrariness, unreasonableness, etc., but such violations may not undermine the rule of law so as to invalidate a statute. Violation must be of such a serious nature which undermines the very basic structure of our Constitution and our democratic principles. But once the court finds, a of statute undermines the rule of law which has the status of a constitutional principle like the basic structure, the above grounds are also available and rt not vice versa. Any law which, in the opinion of the court, is not just, fair and reasonable, is not a ground to strik e down a statute because such an approach would always be subjective, not the will of the people, because there is always a presumption of constitutionality for a statute.
218. The rule of law as a principle, it may be mentioned, is not an absolute means of achieving equality, human rights, justice, freedom and even democracy and it all depends upon the nature of the legislation and the seriousness of the violation. The rule of law as an overarching principle can be applied by the constitutional courts, in the rarest of rare cases, in situations, we have referred to earlier and can undo laws which are tyrannical, violate the basic structure of our Constitution, and our cherished norms of law and justice.