Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Further, because of slow progress of work by plaintiff, since client (BHEL) has withdrawn the project "Construction of NDCT" to plaintiff at Yadadri, Telangana vide LOA No - NBCC/ED(CPG)/2021/726 dated 05.03.2021 for an amount of Rs.98.75 Crores" from the defendant and since the entire work of CT#1,3 & 5 is being executed through other agency at the risk & cost of Defendant (NBCC), the plaintiff is liable to compensate the defendant for the said actual loss, which can be calculated only after completion of the said works. However, it is pertinent to mention that the defendant has also challenged the termination by BHEL before the Administrative Mechanism for Resolution of CPSEs Disputes (AMRCD), a forum established to resolve the disputes between two Government entities. It is clarified that the dispute before AMRCD is pending and has not been finalized yet. The defendant company reserves its right to quantify the said and claim the same from the plaintiff, which the defendant is liable to be compensated, as per relevant Contractual clause agreed between the parties. It is clarified that a clear picture with regard to the dues recoverable from the plaintiff would be possible once the pending dispute between Defendant and BHEL before AMRCD is finalized.