Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: RAM NAIK in M/S Arihant Feeds vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 27 March, 2026Matching Fragments
--- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. K. Rohan, Kabeer Kalwani, Advocates {WPC No. 3580/2022, 4236/2025} Mr. K. Rohan, Advocate {WPC No. 152/2023, 2480/2023, 2481/2023, 1897/2025, 1898/2025} Mr. T.K.Tiwari, Advocate {WPC No. 211/2023, 218/2023, 614/2023} Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate {WPC No. 1376/2023, 1943/2023, 2099/2023, 2519/2023, 2533/2023, 2748/2024} Mr. Manish Nigam, Advocate {WPC No. 1032/2024} Mr. Pankaj Singh, Advocate {WPC No. 536/2026} For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Additional Advocate General For Respondent/Union of India Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Deputy Solicitor General, Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Ms. Annapurna Tiwari, Mr. Amitesh Kumar Pandey and Mr. Rishabh Dev Singh Date of Hearing : 18/03/2026 Date of Judgment : 27/03/2026 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge C.A.V Order Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 1 Heard Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. K. Rohan, Mr. Kabeer Kalwani, Mr. Pankaj Singh, Mr. Amit Sharma, Mr. T.K.Tiwari, Mr. Manish Nigam, learned counsel appearing for the respective petitioners. Also heard Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General for the State, Mr. Ramakant Mishra, learned Deputy Solicitor General alongwith Mr. Roop Ram Naik, Ms.Annapurna Tiwari, Mr. Amitesh Kumar Pandey and Mr. Rishabh Dev Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/Union of India. 2 Since the facts and issues involved in this batch of petitions are identical, they are being considered and decided by this common judgment and WPC No. 3580/2022 is taken as the lead case. 3 By these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks for the following relief(s):