Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

22. Even at the risk of repetition, the Court would like to point out that the requirement of the respondent/petitioner/landlord is bona fide. Even for the sake of argument that this petition should be filed under the provision of section 10 (3) (c) of the said Act, misquoting the provision of law in the petition in question, will not disentitle the respondent/petitioner /landlord to get the relief sought for therein.

23. In order to repudiate the argument advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner/respondent/tenant, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/petitioner/landlord has also argued that the present petition is legally maintainable under section 10 (3) (a) (iii) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 and the Authorities below after considering all the contentions raised on either side have rightly rejected the contention urged on the side of the revision petitioner/respondent/tenant and therefore, the entire argument advanced on the side of the revision petitioner/respondent/tenant is liable to be rejected and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/petitioner /landlord has accited the following decisions.