Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

against the address of the accused, i.e. against word 'Regency Park'. He denied the suggestion that the request for issuance of processes, i.e. NBWs, Process u/s Section 82 and 83 of Cr.PC were issued on incomplete/ wrong address hence the same was not within the knowledge of accused Surender Sood. PW-5 admitted that in his statement which is Ex. PW-5/C, the address of the accused was mentioned as OY-118, Regency Park, DLF- IV, Gurgaon, Haryana, whereas the process i.e. NBWs and process u/s 82 of Cr.PC were issued at address Y-118, Regency Park, DLF-IV, Gurgaon, Haryana. However he stated that the same was a clerical mistake, which he did not notice in his statement although he had signed on his statement at point A after reading the same. PW-5 admitted that he had got published the proceedings u/s 82 of Cr.PC against the accused on 06.07.2007 in two newspapers, i.e. one Hindi newspaper Digitally signed by NABEELA NABEELA WALI WALI Date:
2024.07.04 18:07:35 +0530 certified copy of request to issue process under section 83 Cr.P.C. which is Ex.PW6/G, certified copy of request to extend time for execution of process u/s. 83 Cr.P.C. as Ex.PW6/H, certified copy of process under section 83 Cr.P.C. running in two pages as Ex.PW6/J, certified copy of request to declare accused Surender Sood as proclaimed offender running into two pages as Ex.PW6/K and the statement of Sunita Sood and Sangita Anand as Ex.PW6/L and Ex.PW6/M respectively. PW-6 correctly identified the accused before the court.
EXAMINATION OF ACCUSED U/S 313 CRPC
13. Thereafter, statement of accused Surender Sood u/s 313 CrPC was recorded wherein all the incriminating evidence was put to the accused distinctly, separately and specifically. Accused stated that he is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case at the behest of complainant Rajender Singh in FIR no. 829/2006, PS Crime Branch in collusion with the police in order to blackmail, harass and extort money from him. He stated that no summons/warrants/process under section 82/83 Cr.P.C. were ever served upon him and all the witnesses have deposed falsely. Accused chose to lead defence evidence and examined one witness in his defence.
2024.07.04 18:08:02 +0530 of process u/s 82 CrPC had been pasted outside the house of accused as well as the main location of the locality of the accused by Ct. Gulshan 4562/ND on 28.06.2007. Besides Hue & Cry notice/process had been got published in the leading newspaper but accused Surender Sood remained on absconding deliberately. Process u/s 83 CrPC may please be issued".