distinction between a rule of pleading and a rule of proof. That inconsistent pleadings can be pleaded in the alternative is a well established rule ... provisions of substantive law. Therefore, although it is permissible to plead inconsistent, defences in the alternative, such as right of ownership and right of easement
partners
need not raise a common defence. They may raise
inconsistent defences, but all such defences must
be directed to defend the firm
partners
need not raise a common defence. They may raise
inconsistent defences, but all such defences must
be directed to defend the firm
partners
need not raise a common defence. They may raise
inconsistent defences, but all such defences must
be directed to defend the firm
take alternative pleas, claim alternative
reliefs and/or alternative and inconsistent defences in
the written statement. Amendment can also be allowed at
any stage
