give any explanation in this regard. He
would also contend that, inconsistent defences taken
before the Trial Court will not come to the assistance ... Tanker. No doubt, the accused is at liberty take
inconsistent defences. But, however when he is
supposed to explain certain aspects within his
knowledge under
accused. He would also contend that the accused has
taken inconsistent defences regarding he only acting
as a surety by issuing a security cheque ... presumption on
the basis of preponderance of probability, but
considering the inconsistent defences raised by the
accused regarding availment of loan from the
complainant
gone to the extent of observing that accused
has taken two inconsistent defences and failed to establish
the same and that he is not certain
title by adverse possession. The
trial court has not however, found the inconsistent pleading to be
amiss. This court on the other hand finds that ... defence without leave as many distinct and separate, and
therefore , inconsistent defences as he may think proper. If alternate
cases are alleged , the facts ought
attempt on the part of the accused to raise
contradictory defences at each stage of the proceedings is to be
considered against him. The presumption ... burden shifts on the accused to rebut the presumption.
Except taking inconsistent defences, the accused has not
probablised the same. He has not even stepped
attempt on the part of the accused to raise
contradictory defences at each stage of the proceedings is to be
considered against him. The presumption ... burden shifts on the accused to rebut the presumption.
Except taking inconsistent defences, the accused has not
probablised the same. He has not even stepped
attempt on the part of the accused to raise
contradictory defences at each stage of the proceedings is to be
considered against him. The presumption ... burden shifts on the accused to rebut the presumption.
Except taking inconsistent defences, the accused has not
probablised the same. He has not even stepped
attempt on the part of the accused to raise
contradictory defences at each stage of the proceedings is to be
considered against him. The presumption ... burden shifts on the accused to rebut the presumption.
Except taking inconsistent defences, the accused has not
probablised the same. He has not even stepped
attempt on the part of the accused to raise
contradictory defences at each stage of the proceedings is to be
considered against him. The presumption ... burden shifts on the accused to rebut the presumption.
Except taking inconsistent defences, the accused has not
probablised the same. He has not even stepped
attempt on the part of the accused to raise
contradictory defences at each stage of the proceedings is to be
considered against him. The presumption ... burden shifts on the accused to rebut the presumption.
Except taking inconsistent defences, the accused
