further argued that the Accused has raised
totally inconsistent defences and thereby her entire
defence suffers from doubt, suspicion and
improbabilities. Accordingly, prayed ... while cross-examining the
Complainant, the Accused has taken up two inconsistent
defences, thereby raising a serious doubt about her
defence. Likewise it is elicited
during the present proceeding, the Accused has come up
with 4 inconsistent defences in his attempt to rebut the
presumptions available in favour ... clearly admitted the financial capacity of
the Complainant;
vii) There are inconsistent defences raised by the
Accused in his reply notice, in his chief-
examination
favour of the Complainant.
59. Therefore these contradictory stands and the
inconsistent defences taken by the Accused lead to an
inference that, his defence ... contrary by having taken up two contradictory
and inconsistent defences, he has rendered his defence
version as a highly improbable one. As such, this court
only to the tune of Rs.1 Lakh. There
are inconsistent defences raised by the Accused with
regard to the period, during when he claims ... with the
Complainant was in the year 2014.
49. Therefore these inconsistent defences taken by
the Accused clearly goes to show that
denied the signature of the cheque whereas the accused had taken
inconsistent defences before the Trial Court. At one point of time, he
had taken
denied the signature of the cheque whereas the accused had taken
inconsistent defences before the Trial Court. At one point of time, he
had taken
repay under Ext.P3 notice.
13. As far as the inconsistencies in the evidence of
PW1 highlighted in the appellate judgment are concerned ... inconsistent, will not adversely affect
the prosecution case. The learned counsel points out that the
accused had come forward with different inconsistent
defences, during
trial court has wrongly held that the accused
have taken inconsistent defences. In this regard it
was his argument that, the accused can take
same, it is clear that, the Accused
has taken inconsistent defences with regard to his plea of
discharge of his liability under the subject cheque
proved his case beyond reasonable doubt. The
Accused has taken up inconsistent defences with regard to his
8 C.C.No.19906/2015 J
acquaintance
