further argued that the Accused has raised
totally inconsistent defences and thereby her entire
defence suffers from doubt, suspicion and
improbabilities. Accordingly, prayed ... while cross-examining the
Complainant, the Accused has taken up two inconsistent
defences, thereby raising a serious doubt about her
defence. Likewise it is elicited
signature. However the Accused has taken
total inconsistent defences, by virtue of which, the entire
defence taken by the Accused has become improbable
and unbelievable ... point of
time, while she has come up with total inconsistent
defences while cross-examining the Complainant and
during her evidence before the Court
Judgment lpa28.91
31
denied insufficiency of sale consideration. Thus, this inconsistent plea rules
out any inquiry into availability of legal necessity or otherwise ... These later pleas are inconsistent with the earlier
stand. Though mutually inconsistent defences are permissible, these
defendants during trial have attempted to establish need
notice.
31. It is further argued that the Accused has taken
inconsistent defences and there is no single document
produced by the Accused to prove
Accused clearly goes to show that he has taken inconsistent
defences with regard to the period of the alleged repayment of
the loan
Accused clearly goes to show that he has taken inconsistent
defences with regard to the period of the alleged repayment of
the loan
reasons best
known to him, the Accused has taken up inconsistent
defences thereby creating a serious doubt about the
same.
34 C.C. No.21384
Accused
clearly goes to show that he has taken inconsistent
defences with regard to the period of the alleged
repayment of the loan
police complaint alleging the
cheque in dispute is lost. Thus these contradictory
defences taken by the Accused with regard to the
possession of the cheque ... came to the possession of the
Complainant. With these inconsistent defences, it clearly
goes to show that the defence raised by the Accused in
this
Accused
clearly goes to show that he has taken inconsistent
defences with regard to the period of the alleged
repayment of the loan
