further affirmed that the
arrest memo of accused - Mohd. Afzal, Mohd. Umar, Tehjib,
Sharafat Ali and Akram ... failed to prove the
carges against the accused - Mohd. Akram and hence, accused
- Mohd. Akram is acquitted for the offence
2023
HDB Financial Services Ltd. ........Decree Holder
Vs.
1) Mohd. Akram
S/o Sh. Mohad Akhtar
2) Shoaib Khan
S/o Mohd. Akhtar
3) Sanno ... Akram., Ex. (Comm.) No.06/2023 page 1 of 46
Ex.(Comm.) No.06/2023
HDB Financial Services Ltd. ........Decree Holder
Vs.
(1) Mohd. Akram
Mohd. Akram S/o Mohd. Sadiqa
R/o B-99, Mange Ram Park,
Pooth Kalan, Delhi
2. Mohd. Afsar S/o Mohd.
Akhtar ... Akram @
Kareem, Mohd. Umar Ali, Hari Singh and Naushad. He deposed
that on 03.03.2011 he reached Rohini Jail. Accused Umar Ali,
Hari Singh, Mohd. Akram
Subhash
r/o WZ194, Tihu Village,
Delhi
(3) Mohd. Akram Jaidi @ Chacha Akram
s/o Hakim Asgar Jaidi
r/o Shiv Mandir Road,
behind ... allegation against the accused Mohd. Akram.
There is no link at all since the accused Mohd. Akram was
discharged from the main offence
called telling him that police was looking for Mohd. Akram and he deposed
that Mohd. Akram was brought ... call records evidence of DW-1
Mohd. Rafiq that on 18.04.2006 his brother-in- law accused Mohd. Akram
remained with him through
Suit No.: 251/2021
1. Mohd. Akram
S/o Mohd. Yunus
2. Zeenat Khatoon
W/o Mohd. Akram
Both r/o C-158, Chinot Basti ... 2021 Mohd. Akram and Another Vs. Ruhi Khatoon & Others Page No. 1 of 16
JUDGMENT
1. The plaintiffs/Mohd. Akram and his wife Zeenat
Lalit Sharma (Lrs Of Rajrati Devi) vs Mohammad Akram on 22 April, 2024
MACP No. 308/21; FIR No. 664/20; PS. S.P. Badli ... Delhi.
(Daughter of deceased)
..........Petitioners
VERSUS
Lalit Sharma & Ors. Vs. Mohd. Akram & Ors. Judge MACT 02(North) Page 1 of 27
MACP
came out and witnessed one shopkeeper was quarreling with Mohd.
Akram. Mohd. Akram was asking to get his keys back, when ... after 1-1:30
hours, police officials released accused Mohd. Akram. Accused Mohd.
Akram disclosed him that he was answering a call by stopping
Dayalpur
State versus 1) Shanu @ Zebran
S/o Sh. Mohd. Aslam
2) Mohd. Akram
S/o Late Sh. Mohd. Umar
Both ... revealed that inspected premises belongs
to Mohd. Akram. Thereafter, IO served Mohd. Akram with the notice
under section 41 .1A Cr.P.C . Mohd. Akram
cognizance of the offences qua the accused Mohd.
FIR No. 564/16, PS Saket State v. Mohd. Akram and others Page 3/13
Akram ... Saket State v. Mohd. Akram and others Page 11/13
29. The offence charged against the accused Mohammad Akram
