Wakf would be defeated. There
is prima facie case and balance of convenience in favour of the Wakf
institution. Under these circumstances, the respondent ... Wakf would be defeated. There
is prima facie case and balance of convenience in favour of the Wakf
institution. Under these circumstances, the respondent
prima facie case.
On the balance of convenience the Ld. DR contended that the balance of convenience is in favour of the Revenue ... question of any balance of convenience being in favour of the respondent company. The balance of convenience was certainly in favour of the Government
established by respondent before trial Court, then question of
balance of convenience and irreparable loss caused to respondent have
no meaning to grant to interim ... been made out but
would consider question in regard to balance of convenience of
parties as also irreparable injury which might be suffered by
plaintiffs
same,
defendants stated that plaintiffs have no prima facie case and
balance of convenience is not in favour of plaintiffs and no
irreparable loss ... their favour?
(b) Whether the plaintiffs further prove that the
balance of convenience lies in their favour?
(c) To whom the irreparable loss and hardship
same,
defendants stated that plaintiffs have no prima facie case and
balance of convenience is not in favour of plaintiffs and no
irreparable loss ... their favour?
(b) Whether the plaintiffs further prove that the
balance of convenience lies in their favour?
(c) To whom the irreparable loss and hardship
decided at the time of trial. Also, holding that both the balance of convenience and irreparable injury was also tilted in favour of the petitioners ... convenience and irreparable injury have to co-exist and the trial court did not deal with the two ingredients of balance of convenience and irreparable
proves the prima facie
case ?
(2) Whether plaintiff proves that the balance of
convenience lies in favor of the plaintiff
company ?
(3) Whether plaintiff proves ... name.
51. Balancing the claim of the plaintiff
and that of the defendants, I am of the
opinion that balance of convenience and
irreparable injuries
proves the prima facie
case ?
(2) Whether plaintiff proves that the balance of
convenience lies in favor of the plaintiff
company ?
(3) Whether plaintiff proves ... name.
51. Balancing the claim of the plaintiff
and that of the defendants, I am of the
opinion that balance of convenience and
irreparable injuries
compensated in terms of money, and that the
equity and balance of convenience was in his favour.
The, Trial Court granted interim injunction the same ... great prejudice if the injunction was
granted, and that the balance of convenience was not in
favour of the appellant.
The Trial Court found that
Court must weigh one need
against another and determine where the `balance of
convenience' lies."
The interlocutory remedy is intended to preserve ... success of the plaintiff at the trial
and that the balance of convenience favoured the grant.
This requirement, however, in the matter of grant
