petitioner has been inflicted punishment of
withholding of three increments with cumulative
effect in a departmental proceeding.
II. To quash the letter contained in memo ... increments without cumulative effect does
not at all arise. In case where the increments are
withheld with or without cumulative effect the
government employee
effect of withholding of
increments simpliciter i.e. without cumulative effect, and
with cumulative effect. For example, if an employee is
getting ... working from that stage afresh and, therefore, the effect of
stoppage of increment with cumulative effect is that the
employee is reduced in his time
restored considering the
appellate order, converting his punishment from cumulative effect
to non-cumulative effect.
Thereafter, the petitioner superannuated on 31.01.2019
and he was surprised ... will change from the nature of punishment from cumulative effect
to non-cumulative effect. So far as the order which is said to be passed
imposing the major
punishment of withholding one annual increment with cumulative effect against
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: MOHD AHMAD
Signing time: 2/2/2026 ... whereby the penalty of stoppage of one
increment with cumulative effect has been imposed upon
the petitioner.
It is submitted by the learned counsel
penalty would mandate interference to the effect that the same was so
imposed upon the petitioner with cumulative effect. With regard to a query made ... cumulative effect. This Court having concluded that the said penalty of
withholding of increments, was permissible to be so imposed with cumulative effect,
inasmuch
increments
without cumulative effect does not at all arise. In case where
the increments are withheld with or without cumulative effect
the Government employee ... increment with cumulative effect, whereas
in Kulwant Singh Gill (supra), it was stoppage of two increments with
cumulative effect. We borrow the reasonings of Their
increments with cumulative effect. The petitioner vide order dated
10.07.2014 was awarded punishment of stoppage of three increments
with cumulative effect. He preferred appeal which ... increments without cumulative effect does not at all arise.
In case where the increments are withheld with or without
cumulative effect the government employee
imposed with punishment of stoppage of one increment with
cumulative effect on account of certain allegations. He has also
challenged the order dated 23.8.2018, whereby ... increments without cumulative effect
does not at all arise. In case where the increments are
withheld with or without cumulative effect the
Signature Not Verified
imposed with the penalty of withholding of two
annual increments with cumulative effect, recovery of
₹3,02,691/- at ₹10,000/- per month, treating ... though
respondent-board contends that withholding of increments
with or without cumulative effect constitutes a minor
penalty under Rule 9, such a contention is legally
dated 30.11.2016, imposing a major penalty of
withholding two increments with cumulative effect. The petitioner
preferred an appeal against this order, which was dismissed ... cumulative effect is deemed to be a major
penalty. This has to be held so because the
penalty if imposed with cumulative effect will
