Section 29 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
course of trade, a mark which is identical with, or deceptively similar to, the trade mark in relation to goods or services in respect
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 6696 (1.98 seconds)Section 134 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
defendant of any trade mark which is identical with or deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s trade mark, whether registered or unregistered, shall be instituted
Kaviraj Pandit Durga Dutt Sharma vs Navaratna Pharmaceutical ... on 20 October, 1964
deceptively similar to the respondent's.
On this matter also, there are concurrent findings of the
Courts below regarding the deceptive similarity ... mark is deceptively similar to
that of the respondents cannot be stated to be erroneous.
Besides, this question of deceptive similarity is a question
Parle Products (P) Ltd vs J. P. & Co. Mysore on 28 January, 1972
Deceptively
similar'--Proper approach by court for determining if one
mark is deceptively similar to another.
HEADNOTE:
The appellants filed a suit ... similar to, the trade mark, in relation to any
goods in respect of which the trade mark is, registered; and
the expression 'deceptively similar
Section 2 in The Trade Marks Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
mark from those of others; (h) “deceptively similar”.— A mark shall be deemed to be deceptively similar to another mark if it so nearly resembles ... trade mark; and (b) is or are identical with or deceptively similar to the name or initials of a person carrying on business in connection
Section 2 in The Trade And Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
trade mark, of that person; (d) "deceptively similar": - A mark shall be deemed to be deceptively similar to another mark if it so nearly resembles ... trade mark; and (b) is or are identical with or deceptively similar to the name or initials of a person carrying on business in connection
Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd vs Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel & Ors on 29 August, 2006
defendants is phonetically and visibly similar with
the label of the plaintiff. It is deceptively similar
with the label of the plaintiff. It creates deception ... label in
larger size, in first alphabet definitely creates
deception and confusion. It is deceptively similar
with the trade-mark of the plaintiff. Therefore
Mahendra And Mahendra Paper Mills Ltd vs Mahindra And Mahindra Ltd on 9 November, 2001
words "Mahendra & Mahendra" or any word which is
deceptively similar to "Mahindra" and/or 'Mahindra & Mahindra ... phonetically,
visually and structurally almost identical and in any event deceptively
similar. In the prospectus of the defendant the words "Mahendra and
Mahendra
F. Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. Ltd vs Geoffrey Manners & Co. Pvt. Ltd on 8 September, 1969
Vitamin preparations--'DROPOVIT" whether a trade mark
deceptively similar to 'PROTOVIT' so as to offened s.
12(1)--'DROPOVIT ... defines the phrase
"deceptively similar" as follows:
"A mark shall be deemed to. be deceptively
similar 'to another mark
K. R. Chinna Krishna Chettiar vs Sri Ambal & Co., Madras & Anr on 14 April, 1969
different goddesses are deceptively
similar in sound within meaning of s. 12(1)-Visual
dissimilarity not decisive when sounds deceptively similar.
HEADNOTE:
The appellant ... Andal. The two words
are deceptively similar in sound.
The name Andal does not cease to be deceptively similar
because it is used in conjunction