Limitation Act, 1908, Article 96 of the
Limitation Act, 1963 and Section 31 of the Limitation
Act, 1963 are also very relevant for our purpose ... Limitation
Act, 1908, while Articles 64 and 65 of the Limitation Act,
1963 correspond to Articles 142 and 144 of the
Limitation Act, 1908
will not save the limitation within the meaning of section
14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (in short ' Limitation Act ')
dismissed the suit ... Limitation Act. It was
held that no contra decision was cited and, therefore, with
reference to Section 113 of the Limitation Act, 1908 (in short
Limitation Act,
1963 , is applicable to the present case. Under Article 10 of the
Limitation Act, 1963 , period of limitation for filing a claim against ... Limitation Act, 1908 (corresponding to Article 11
of the Limitation Act, 1963 ). Article 31 of the Limitation Act, 1908
applies to cases of non-delivery
change. In terms of Articles
142 ans 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the burden of proof was on the
plaintiff to show within ... immovable property, by Article 144 of the Limitation Act,
1908. Article 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908 has been materially re-enacted as
Article
change. In terms of Articles
142 ans 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the burden of proof was on the
plaintiff to show within ... immovable property, by Article 144 of the Limitation Act,
1908. Article 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908 has been materially re-enacted as
Article
under:-
''Art. 64 of the Limitation Act, 1963 ( Art. 142 of
the Limitation Act, 1908) is restricted to suits for
possession on dispossession ... discontinuance. Art. 65 of the Limitation Act,
1963 ( Art. 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908) on
the other hand is a residuary article applying
change. In terms of Articles
142 ans 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the burden of proof was on the
plaintiff to show within ... immovable property, by Article 144 of the Limitation Act,
1908. Article 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908 has been materially re-enacted as
Article
limitation was provided in any of the articles under the Limitation
Act, 1963 . It is submitted that earlier in Limitation Act, 1908
where there ... period
6 months was provided. In the Limitation Act, 1963 the earlier Art.
120 of Limitation Act, 1908 has been numbered
change. In terms of Articles
142 ans 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the burden of proof was on the
plaintiff to show within ... immovable property, by Article 144 of the Limitation Act,
1908. Article 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908 has been materially re-enacted as
Article
change. In terms of Articles
142 ans 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the burden of proof was on the
plaintiff to show within ... immovable property, by Article 144 of the Limitation Act,
1908. Article 144 of the Limitation Act, 1908 has been materially re-enacted as
Article
