same terms, one of them is reproduced below:
"Release Deed.
This Deed of release executed this 30th day of June 1957, by Sri --aged ... cash by way of consideration for the release and
that therefore the deeds are release deeds. On
the other hand it is contended
offered his help in getting the sale deed effected and asked the respondent to execute a release deed nominally in his favour and subsequently tried ... Release Deed dated 25.8.73 and his case relating to the circumstances under which he executed the release deed is to be found in paras
that the said deed is void and not binding on her In the alternative she contended that if the release deed, dated ... shape of release-deed is removed Therefore the relief relating to the cancellation of the release-deed is an integral part of the relief that
provisions made in their favour in the original settlement deed and the release deed did not transfer any property in their favour. Accordingly, the Appellate ... provision made in their favour under the original deed of settlement and the release deed did not create any interest in their favour. It took
relying on the deed for title to prove the execution of the deed-Ext. D-1 which is termed as release deed which is dated ... matter of release itself and
not in favour of a stranger. The deed in question has wrongly been called a release deed. The title
titled as a
WP.15209/2015
4
'Release Deed'. Under the said Release Deed, her sisters
were stated to have relinquished their share ... each.
5. In the said Release Deed, there was also a recital
that their father - Thimmanna had executed a registered
Will in favour
womb of the plaintiff, the first defendant executed a registered release deed on 19.01.1994 in favour of defendants 2 to 9 relinquishing all his rights ... deceased son of plaintiff died as stated above. The alleged release deed dated 19.01.1994 is hostile to the interest of the minor
defendant that the release deed was a gift deed, but it was his case that it was a release deed ... release deed made erroneous observation as follows :
"The above said extracts are crystal clear to the effect that Ramanna executed a release deed
change the
succession in view of the release deed. He also contended
35
that the release deed is not in respect of the suit schedule ... well settled rule of interpretation
of deeds of release that however wide and
general the covenant of release may be, its
operation must be restricted
know the contents of the release deed and, therefore, no reliance can be placed on the release deed Ex.P-1 by the plaintiff ... Releasor in respect of the release herein made
24. Therefore, the said averments in paragraph-2 of the release deed cannot be considered as passing
