present suit on the ground that she was not the nest reversioner. Defendant 4 who is the third widow of Brajamohan first filed a joint ... Brajamohan and whether the plaintiff and her sons are the ultimate reversioners?
2. The learned Subordinate Judge in his judgment dated 30-3-1946, while
favour of defendant No. 2 (Lochan Patel) is not binding against the reversioners of the last male owner Parmananda Patel. Paramananda ... declaration that the sale-deed (Ex. A) is not binding against the reversioners as it was not for legal necessity. The consideration
favour of one Indumati Pandiani sometime in 1916. Her husband's reversioners, namely, Natabar and Janardan (defendant No. 1 and the father of defendant ... plaintiffs in that suit (Natabar and Janardan) were admittedly not the nearest reversioners of Lokanath because Purshottom (father of defendant No. 2 Sripati) was then
under a disability. In this case both the sisters are presumptive reversioners. Each in her own right is entitled to succeed to the property after ... several decisions concerning the nature and character of a suit by a reversioner for a declaration of the invalidity of an adoption made
trend of authorities in almost all the High Courts that a reversioner has no interest, either in the mortgage property or the equity of redemption ... reversioner has a mere spes successions in the estate left by last male owner, it being always uncertain if a particular reversioner would survive
into by the widow would be defeated at the hands of the reversioner it a literal construction is placed upon the words "person claiming ... transferor" because under the Hindu law the estate passes to the reversioner on the death of the widow as the heir of the last
Krushna Behera brought a suit for declaration that he is the next reversioner to deceased Gangadhar, for setting aside the sales effected by Gangadhar ... maintainable inasmuch as the present plaintiff is not the next reversioner of late Gangadhar inasmuch as the present pltf. was adopted by Achut, the uncle
does not bind
the plaintiff who is alleged to be the nearest reversioner.
2. Plaintiff's case is that one Ananda Ojha, Dinabandhu Ojha ... legal necessity for the alienation and the alienation does not bind the reversioner; and that the suit was filed by the
p
laintiff alone
their Lordships of the Privy Council whereupon the petitioner Kuppasami Pillai (another reversioner) applied to be substituted in the place of the deceased appellant Venkatanarayana ... principle of law that suit of this nature brought by the presumptive reversioner is a representative one not for the personal benefit of the presumptive
novel point of law, namely, whether the consent of a female reversioner to an alienation made by a limited owner is presumptive proof of legal ... alienation the mother-in-law (widow of Raghu) was the next presumptive reversioner and that since she had joined in the alienation she must
