Exhibit PW-11/A) reveals that phone calls were made from mobile
SIM No. 9718006863 to mobile phone of Ram Narain Sharma, the
father ... mobile phone records relating
to mobile No. 9718006863 and the fact that the said mobile SIM was
used in the mobile phone Nokia
Mohd. Shahid vs State Nct Of Delhi on 4 December, 2015
Author: Sanjiv Khanna
Bench
phone of Tarun bearing no.
9891102594. Initially, phone was not attended, but after some time
when his nephew Hemant Bhardwaj called from his mobile phone ... from the mobile phone of Hemant (PW9) to the mobile phone of the
deceased, on which ransom was demanded. On the next day at about
Sharma, one mobile phone of make
NOKIA bearing IMEI No.351545/04/362914/5 was recovered. During TIP,
the mobile phone was identified ... confirms this fact.
(vii) The mobile phone handset was identified by Pooja, daughter of the
deceased.
(viii) Mobile phone was recovered on arrest of accused
further alleged that the sim card corresponding to the mobile
phone number 9811008825 was destroyed by the accused Satya Prakash ... allegedly causing the destruction of the sim card
of mobile phone No. 9811008825 with the intention to screen himself and other
offenders from legal punishment
recorded six
ransom calls made on the mobile phone of PW-1 on his own mobile phone,
i.e., 9553. According to the prosecution, IMEI ... phone of PW-1.
48. It is claimed that "the parallel line of the complainant‟s phone was taken
on the mobile phone number
present incident, Nishu Dixit and Chandan Gupta had snatched the mobile phone of his son and he went to the house of Lalit Dixit where ... conducted at Mainpuri and got it done afterwords. The mobile phone of his son was snatched three days prior to the incident and the same
Jogi had demanded his mobile phone which was handed over to him.
PW9 forgot to take back his mobile phone. All the facts were duly ... took the mobile phone from him.
26. PW13 Rajeev Sharda, Nodal Officer, Reliance Communications Ltd.,
proved the CDR of mobile phone 9911251863 of PW9 Azad
Dinesh has not denied that his mobile phone was seized from
him. He further submits that mobile phone was purchased by him from
appellant Raju ... deny having purchase of the mobile phone from
appellant Raju. He further did not deny that the mobile phone was
recovered from him.
SUBMISSIONS
beneath an oil palm. By
that time, a phone call came to the mobile phone of A1 that his
younger brother was abducted by somebody ... obtained his
(PW7's) mobile phone, called somebody and talked and then,
returned the mobile phone by stating that there was no problem
