Section 7 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963
7. Recovery of specific movable property.—
A person entitled to the possession of specific movable property
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16817 (3.85 seconds)K.N Rao & Anr vs M/S Composite Securities Ltd & Ors on 28 January, 2022
there
is misappropriation or conversion of a movable property, the Plaintiff can
seek either the movable property back or compensation in lieu thereof. This ... provides a
limitation of three years for a suit for specific
movable property lost, or acquired by theft,
or dishonest misappropriation or conversion,
commencing from
Lewis Pugh Evans Pugh vs Ashutosh Sen on 14 December, 1928
plaintiffs claiming damages for the conversion by the defendants of specific movable property, viz., coal wrongfully gotten from the plaintiffs' mines and sold ... trover, and the damages awarded were damages for conversion of specific movable property, viz., the coal when separated from the land, the conversion consisting
State Of U.P vs Rajiv Kumar Mishra And Anr on 28 August, 2015
Limitation
Act deals with specific movable property which is capable of being
possessed. Thus, movable property to be covered under the purview of
Article ... term movable
property can be found in Section 3(36) of the General Clauses Act, 1897
which reads thus-
“movable property, shall mean property
Sankar Dastidar vs Shrimati Banjula Dastidar & Anr on 5 December, 2006
Limitation Act govern suits in respect of
movable property. For specific movable property lost or acquired by theft,
or dishonest misappropriation or conversion; knowledge ... point of limitation in terms of
Article 68. For any other specific movable property, the time from which
the period begins to run would
Champalal vs Ramchander And Anr. on 19 August, 1975
Limitation Act, 1908, read as under:--
" Art. 48.
For specific movable property lost or acquired by theft, or dishonest misappropriation or conversion ... first learns in whose possession it is.
Art. 49.
For other specific movable property, or for compensation for wrongfully taking or injuring or wrongfully detaining
Standard Chartered Bank vs Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd& Ors on 28 August, 2015
Limitation
Act deals with specific movable property which is capable of being
possessed. Thus, movable property to be covered under the purview of
Article ... term movable
property can be found in Section 3(36) of the General Clauses Act, 1897
which reads thus-
“movable property, shall mean property
The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs The Hindustan Lever Ltd. on 8 February, 1972
Articles 48 and 49 apply to suits relating to specific movable property or compensation for injury or wrongful detention thereof. It is true that ... Specific Relief Act (No. 1 of 1877). Under Section 10 , a person entitled to the possession of specific movable property may recover the same
M/S Varuna Integrated Logistics Pvt. ... vs M/S Goel Road Carriers & Anr on 13 December, 2013
provides a limitation of
three years for a suit for specific movable property lost, or acquired by theft,
or dishonest misappropriation or conversion, commencing from ... Article can apply, has to be a suit for recovery of specific
movable property and not a suit for recovery of value thereof
Standard Chartered Bank vs 1) Andhra Bank Financial Services on 13 July, 2010
Standard Chartered Bank vs 1) Andhra Bank Financial Services on 13 July, 2010
Author: V