found that three calls were
made from same mobile number to telephone number 0113355751 which
number was found to be that of BBC correspondent ... this
mobile No.9811278510 was being used from two instruments whose IMEI
number (identification number engraved on the mobile handset by the
manufacturer) were obtained
took A-10 and himself to A-6
for changing the IMEI number because it was an expensive mobile phone
and they had decided ... number of
the car. They never obtained CDRs of the mobile number of the deceased.
The invoice of the mobile phone which contained the IMEI
Bhadange (father of deceased child victim) on his mobile from
the unknown numbers.
(iv) Employee of PW 1 by name Yogesh Patange identified the
voice ... Imtiyaz.
(v) After arrest of accused no. 1, mobile handsets with IMEI
number from which calls were made to PW 1 Rajesh were seized
from
petitioner has no connection with;
c. That the 15-digit IMEI number for the cell phone, allegedly belonging to
the petitioner containing the SIM with ... ending with
XXX5961, mentioned in the seizure memo differs from the IMEI number
mentioned in the call detail record;
d. There is no evidence that
Phone No. 9811278510 was
changed to IMEI No. 449173405451240. It
transpired from the evidence that this IMEI
number, that the Mobile Phone No.
9811278510 with ... IMEI
numbers, namely, 445199440940240 and
449173405451240. A pattern showed the use
of the third number which was 0116315904,
the number of the computer centre
crime. It came to light that IMEI No.353576051308213 [one of the IMEI Number of the cellphone instrument of the deceased] was activated near Siruseri ... stated as to how to find out the exact IMEI Number of a mobile phone instrument from out of the false number given
pointing out of injured Rajinder Singh.
During the course of investigation, IMEI numbers of the
:5:
looted mobile phones were obtained as 356853030037580 of mobile ... Singh and 355727023536670 of
mobile No. 9759824464 of deceased Rakesh. The IMEI numbers were
put on search and it was revealed that one mobile
Bhadange (father of deceased child victim) on his mobile from
the unknown numbers.
(iv) Employee of PW 1 by name Yogesh Patange identified the
voice ... Imtiyaz.
(v) After arrest of accused no. 1, mobile handsets with IMEI
number from which calls were made to PW 1 Rajesh were seized
from
Bhadange (father of deceased child victim) on his mobile from
the unknown numbers.
(iv) Employee of PW 1 by name Yogesh Patange identified the
voice ... Imtiyaz.
(v) After arrest of accused no. 1, mobile handsets with IMEI
number from which calls were made to PW 1 Rajesh were seized
from
Bhadange (father of deceased child victim) on his mobile from
the unknown numbers.
(iv) Employee of PW 1 by name Yogesh Patange identified the
voice ... Imtiyaz.
(v) After arrest of accused no. 1, mobile handsets with IMEI
number from which calls were made to PW 1 Rajesh were seized
from
