manage the report of the Process Server and the Postman. Since incorrect address of his house was shown it cannot be said that the petitioner ... address of the petitioner which makes it evident that the private respondents know the correct address of the petitioner and had deliberately mentioned incorrect address
inter alia submitted that the respondent had
delivered their reply at incorrect address and therefore the appellant received delayed
response.
5.2. The respondent while defending ... second appeal as the respondent had dispatched
the reply at incorrect address. The respondent have provided point-wise information
within 30 days from date
that the applicant vide his original RTI application has provided
their incorrect address as 29/1 Vishwakarma Colony instead of 294/1
Vishwakarma Colony ... result, the reply was sent at the incorrect address due
to the fault of applicant himself and not on the part of the Bank
However, the District Magistrate has observed that the petitioner had indicated his incorrect name in his application form and had also not indicated that ... which related to cheating, the authorities in giving incorrect address and also in making false statement on oath that no criminal case was either lodged
there was no building with No. 58/25/4 and an incorrect address has been shown in the notice. Therefore, the same was not served
Property Act was sent by the landlord deliberately on an incorrect address which notice having not been served, the filing of the said SCC Suit ... when the defendant has categorically stated that the address noted on the notice in question was incorrect and that the notice was not received
Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021 mentioning the incorrect address of the petitioner, therefore, no notice could be served upon him and the Suit ... execution of the order dated 27.8.2024 again showing the incorrect address and, therefore, the summons could not be served upon the petitioner. The execution case
directing the District Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar (Respondent no.2), so that the address shown in relation to the petitioner's son Vikas ... Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Kanpur Nagar issued a Family Membership Certificate showing incorrect address of Vikas who had died due to an unfortunate incident. The petitioner
first appeal was also not received by the respondent due to
incorrect address. Subsequently, the respondent informed that CCTV footage as sought
by the appellant
letter was
returned undelivered with remarks from the Post Office "incorrect address". Further, on
receipt of the hearing notice, the reply was again