plaintiff and his witness Girdhari Lal have intentionally given their incorrect addresses before the Court on affidavit and have therefore made false statement before ... stating incorrect facts before the Court and in fact misled the Court. Even in the plaint the plaintiff gave incorrect address and during his statement
notice dated 24.06.2015 too was addressed to the
respondent at its correct address, that is, Rajendra Petrol Pump address.
FAO (COMM) 156/2023
Signature ... incorrect address - Prem Nagar address
- and accordingly, directed that all future communications be sent at the
respondent's address as reflected
seems that they joined
investigation but gave their wrong and incorrect addresses. However, the paper slips
bearing signatures of these witnesses were found intact
addressed. Admittedly in the present case notice was sent to an
incorrect address at which the petitioner was not present.
10. He relies ... case
the notice is correctly addressed. If the notice is incorrectly addressed
no legal presumption can arise. In the present case, the complainant
had annexed
best it could be said to be a case of incorrect
address. Further PW11 Rajesh Bali, the officer from the bank has stated that ... given address. Further Appellant Anil
Maheshwari has given three addresses in the claim file; with the National
Insurance Corporation the address given is 3499 Chawri
notice addressed to the accused - on the addresses mentioned in the UPC
(Ex.CW1/H) were never delivered as the said addresses ... said
address. There is no evidence led by the accused to show that, either the
said address is incorrect, or that
regarding arbitration proceedings
sent by the arbitrator were addressed to an incorrect
address and on the second occasion, though addressed to
the correct address ... returned with the remark "unclaimed" and not because
the address was incorrect or not found.
13. The arbitrator in his order/record
that the swift message was sent at wrong address is absolutely
incorrect. Defendant No. 1 is State Bank of Patiala, Darya Ganj Branch with ... counsels for the Defendants have laid lot of emphasis on the
incorrect address to which swift messages were sent by the Plaintiff. In this
have intimated change of address on 22.02.1989. Priority matured on 7.8.1996. Allotment letter was posted at old address. Petitioner claims to have learnt about ... demand cum allotment letter inasmuch as it was posted at an incorrect address, a fact admitted by the DDA. Petitioner claims that
examined. Counsel for the
prosecution emphasized that the witnesses had given incorrect addresses
and were not traceable. The prosecution was under no obligation to verify
