trustees do not reside at Bhamburdi
(Mote Vasti), deliberately furnished such incorrect address to the
ACC in order to scuttle effective service of notice upon ... address of
the existing trustees filed an address pursis on 18 March 2009
indicating his own address at Bhamburdi (Mote Vasti) as the
changed address
Petitioner No.1 Company
before striking it off was issued in incorrect address, for which, the impugned
notification/ order dated 08.08.2007 was not sustainable ... statutory notice was sent to the Petitioner No.1 in an
incorrect address, as reflected in the said notice (Annexure-2) itself, which is
different
that
bill was not their stamp which also bore an incorrect address. According
to the FI, he had personally visited the shop and godown ... address mentioned on document Mark-X was the correct address of
accused no. 2. Even that complaint against the accused no. 2 discloses the
address
regarding arbitration proceedings
sent by the arbitrator were addressed to an incorrect
address and on the second occasion, though addressed to
the correct address ... returned with the remark "unclaimed" and not because
the address was incorrect or not found.
13. The arbitrator in his order/record
hearing the
respondent since none could be notified because of
incorrect address given by the appellant and proper
particulars not furnished
sent the notice under
Section 263 to an incorrect address which resulted in the Appellant not
being given an opportunity of being heard on 22nd ... same to the Delhi address of the Appellant. He
submits that even the notice to the Delhi address was returned to the ITO,
Kolkata
unserved due to the address being issued to the wrong and incorrect address.
From the copies of the Income-tax return available at pages ... thus the issuance of notice to the wrong and incorrect address cannot be held
as valid issuance and service of notice by post
letter sent to that party came
back un served because of incorrect address. The assessee produced copy
of account, income tax return and bank statement
petitioner was declared a proclaimed offender after serving
notices at the incorrect address thus causing hindrance in the grant of
anticipatory bail.
3. Learned
Singh were received un-served by the I.O.
due to incorrect address. Notices issued to co accused Khekh
