Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (3.47 seconds)

State vs . 1. Bihari Mukhiya on 25 October, 2013

Hazari, Delhi who recorded the statement of the prosecutrix u/s 164 Cr.P.C. and proved the statement of the prosecutrix coupled with ... working as a Teacher in the Government Girls Senior Secondary School, Roop Nagar No. 1, Delhi. She had hired a maid/prosecutrix (name withheld) from
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Shiva on 18 December, 2013

mentioned in the CBSE Record is 23.3.1994 whereas in the school record it is 24.3.1994 but he is unable to explain the said discrepancy. (27) However ... defence. (29) Fourthly even in her statement under Section 164 Cr.PC (not disputed by the accused) the prosecutrix had told
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 8 April, 2021

guardian, commits the offence of kidnapping, punishable under Section 363 of IPC. Thus, it is indispensable for the prosecution to prove the following ... date of kidnapping, i.e. 26.10.2016. The prosecution had annexed the C.B.S.E. certificate of one Komal Yadav with the charge-sheet. However
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1