order
dated 26th April, 2017 passed by the Principal Bench, CAT in Contempt
Petition No.633/2016 arising out of OA No.3826/2013. There ... Petitioners
had challenged the order of the CAT dismissing the Petitioners‟ Contempt
Petition against the non-compliance by the Respondents of the directions
issued
dated
14.10.2019 passed by the learned CAT.
21.1 The cryptic order of the learned CAT passed in contempt petition
bearing CP No.79/2020 dated ... directions was not duly pressed upon
before learned CAT. The observation of learned CAT that the order dated
14.10.2019 was substantially complied with by BSNL
leading to
both the Petitioners filing contempt petitions before the CAT. While these
contempt petitions were pending, the GNCTD filed W.P.(C) 5235/2016 ... said order of the CAT.
25. Although the order dated 15th September, 2016 of the CAT dismissing
the Petitioners‟ contempt petitions could be viewed
order of the CAT passed in 2013. The said orders, therefore, became final.
12. Respondent No.1 filed Contempt Petition No.396/2013 ... implementation of the order of the CAT. In the said contempt petition, the
CAT granted four weeks‟ time, on 12th September 2013, for compliance
1998 before the Lucknow Bench of the CAT. This was
dismissed by the CAT on 14th May, 2002 on the ground that the decision ... dismissed on 15th June, 2005.
18. What prompted the impugned contempt petition filed before CAT was
that Respondent No.2 had calculated the arrears
grant such benefits, Munni Devi filed
OA No. 4273/2014 in the CAT. In the said OA she relied on the decision
dated 25th April ... Page 3 of 20
7. Munni Devi preferred Contempt Petition (CP) No.795/2015 in the CAT.
However, it was dismissed by the CAT
Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi („CAT‟) in
T.A. No. 04/2014.
2. By the impugned order, the CAT quashed the report dated 12th ... benefits ordered by the CAT, including the arrears
of salary from September, 2009 till May 2015, she filed a contempt petition.
It was at that
review petitioners took a different stand before the CAT. The Hon'ble CAT
vide judgement dated 15.12.2016 allowed O.A.No. 587/2016 ... said judgment was not complied with, respondent preferred a Contempt
Petition before the CAT. During pendency of the Contempt Petition, the
present petitioner passed
learned CAT passed an order, prima facie
holding that Shri Sarpreet Singh Gill has committed contempt of Court in
passing the impugned order dated ... Government in the contempt petition, the
present respondent no.1 filed the OA No. 1214/2016 before CAT for
implementation of its earlier directions. CAT
review petitioners took a different stand before the CAT. The Hon'ble CAT
vide judgement dated 15.12.2016 allowed O.A.No. 590/2016 ... said judgment was not complied with, respondent preferred a Contempt
Petition before the CAT. During pendency of the Contempt Petition, the
present petitioners passed
