contempt case and not directing implementation of its order
dated 12th May, 2016 and in not punishing the respondents for contempt
thereof.
8. CAT ... whether not the scope of interference with an order of CAT closing the
contempt case, should be in an extremely narrow compass, considering that
even
order
dated 26th April, 2017 passed by the Principal Bench, CAT in Contempt
Petition No.633/2016 arising out of OA No.3826/2013. There ... Petitioners
had challenged the order of the CAT dismissing the Petitioners‟ Contempt
Petition against the non-compliance by the Respondents of the directions
issued
turn
promotion according to the directions of the CAT. He
subsequently filed contempt proceedings (CP 18/2004) before the
CAT against the respondents. Since ... fresh O.A. before the CAT.
Therefore, the Court declared the CAT's order in the contempt
proceedings unsustainable but left it open
CAT. By its order dated 1st January 2003, the Division Bench of CAT had dismissed the petitioner's Contempt Petition. (g) Hence this writ ... 1197/2001 and not on the plea of the contempt power of the CAT. In our view, the contempt petition in OA No. 1197/2001
dated
14.10.2019 passed by the learned CAT.
21.1 The cryptic order of the learned CAT passed in contempt petition
bearing CP No.79/2020 dated ... directions was not duly pressed upon
before learned CAT. The observation of learned CAT that the order dated
14.10.2019 was substantially complied with by BSNL
leading to
both the Petitioners filing contempt petitions before the CAT. While these
contempt petitions were pending, the GNCTD filed W.P.(C) 5235/2016 ... said order of the CAT.
25. Although the order dated 15th September, 2016 of the CAT dismissing
the Petitioners‟ contempt petitions could be viewed
that the petitioner having not complied
with the order of CAT, is in contempt and cannot even be heard in the
matter; (c) that ... impugned order of CAT cannot be sustained. CAT did not
also notice that the applicants before the Full Bench of CAT were directly
absorbed
order of the CAT passed in 2013. The said orders, therefore, became final.
12. Respondent No.1 filed Contempt Petition No.396/2013 ... implementation of the order of the CAT. In the said contempt petition, the
CAT granted four weeks‟ time, on 12th September 2013, for compliance
Administrative
Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to
as „CAT‟) dismissing
the Contempt Petition Nos.126/2014 in OA No.3827/2013 ... petitioners also raised the
grievance that while dismissing the Contempt Petitions, the
learned CAT has exceeded its jurisdiction by modifying the
earlier order dated
Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the 'CAT')
whereby the learned CAT had dismissed the Contempt Petition No.
4/2014 ... facts the
petitioner was constrained to file a contempt petition but the learned CAT
instead of taking cognizance of the contempt committed by the
respondents
