this petition arises.
8. CAT, in the impugned order has reasoned that (i) the order dated 2nd
April, 2013 of CAT ... writ petition aforesaid,
though the petitioner had filed a contempt petition in CAT but the said
contempt petition was also closed vide order dated 18th
competitive exam and pursuant
to order dated 13th January, 2012 of CAT in O.A. No.3823/2011 preferred
by respondent No.1. However ... respondent no.1 has already instituted Contempt Proceedings before CAT.
The counsel for the respondent no.1 further states that the aforesaid Archana
accordance with the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act
for intentionally, deliberately and wilfully committing contempt of the
order dated 21.08.2023 passed ... order by the learned CAT is concerned,
learned CAT itself has the jurisdiction to entertain matters, where contempt
of its orders have been committed
filed OA No.1831/2018 which was
disposed of by learned CAT, vide order dated 09.05.2018, at the stage of
admission itself, without going into ... before learned CAT
alleging wilful disobedience of directions passed by learned CAT vide order
dated 09.05.2018 which was dismissed by learned CAT vide order dated
filed OA No.1833/2018 which was
disposed of by learned CAT, vide order dated 09.05.2018, at the stage of
admission itself, without going into ... before learned CAT
alleging wilful disobedience of directions passed by learned CAT vide order
dated 09.05.2018 which was dismissed by learned CAT vide order dated
CAT), Principal Bench, Delhi in OA No.
2154/2013 preferred by the petitioner as well as the order dated 18th
October, 2019 of CAT dismissing ... statements made by the respondents before CAT, leading to
the order dated 28th October, 2015 and of contempt committed by the
respondents and accordingly moved
dated
19th September 2008, a decision had been taken.
15. A second contempt petition being Cont Case (C) No. 150 of 2009 filed ... CAT clearly overlooked the specific direction in the order passed by the
learned Single Judge dated 30th January, 2009, dismissing the Contempt
Case
being CP No.171/2014
before the learned CAT. The order passed by the learned CAT on
16.02.2022, is impugned in this writ petition ... petitioner in the contempt petition
subsists even today. In the contempt petition filed before the learned
CAT the petitioner stated, inter alia, as under
impugned order passed in contempt proceedings, exceeds the
direction given in the original judgment dated 07.08.2006 of the CAT.
Learned counsel stressed upon the fact ... 2004] and the impugned order dated 02.04.2009
[in contempt proceedings], that all the CAT did was to ensure effectuation of
W.P.(C) 10179/2009
disposal of the writ petition, the contempt proceedings
initiated by the respondents are stayed before the CAT.
Keeping in view of the aforesaid, the present
