deal with contempt matters for which there are separate Rules namely CAT (Contempt of Court) Rules 1992. The above procedure Rules have been framed ... been saved either in the Contempt of Court Act 1971 or in the Central Administrative Tribunal (Contempt of Courts) Rules,1992. Therefore, this submission also
Administrative
Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to
as „CAT‟) dismissing
the Contempt Petition Nos.126/2014 in OA No.3827/2013 ... petitioners also raised the
grievance that while dismissing the Contempt Petitions, the
learned CAT has exceeded its jurisdiction by modifying the
earlier order dated
order dated 22.12.2015 passed by the
Hon'ble CAT in Contempt Petition No. 758/2015 in O.A.
No.4384/2015-Vinod Kumar
contempt jurisdiction. In fact,
during the course of submissions, it was brought to the
notice of this Court that before the CAT, even today,
proceedings ... large before the CAT and which is
touching upon the subject matter of this petition, this
Court will not exercise the contempt jurisdiction
application No. 17/2003 to Honble CAT, Allahabad making the appellate order as an issue of contempt order ... CAT, Allahabad and finally disposing off the said application, the Honble CAT Allahabad on 25.2.2003 clearly said that the case of contempt
request to HC plus direction that CAT will not hold us in
contempt."
Based on this note, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Black Cats Security And Man vs Mrs. Sita Lakshmi on 12 April, 2016
Author: T.S. Sivagnanam
Bench: T.S. Sivagnanam
In the High Court ... Justice T.S. Sivagnanam
Contempt Petition No: 978 of 2016
M/s. Black Cats Security and Man
Power Consultancy Services
No: 44/25, Anna Salai
were not
complied with, a Contempt Petition was filed by Usha Rani Singh.
Upon filing of the Contempt Petition, the order dated 25.03.2014 passed ... CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi for extending the benefit of
GPF-cum-pension scheme.
WHEREAS The Hon‟ble CAT, Principal Bench, New Delhi vide
order
Supreme
Court had held that purposes of initiation of contempt
proceedings are two-fold: to ensure the compliance of the
order passed by the court ... Khan & Ors., 2013(3)
SLJI CAT (Civil Misc. Recall Application No. 3242/2011 in
Civil Misc. Contempt Petition No. 164/2007), the Allahabad
Bench
payment
of the same amounts to contempt of the orders of this Tribunal, the
petitioner filed the present Contempt Petition.
CP 162/2015 ... submitted that
they have not committed any contempt of the orders of this Tribunal.
9. The respondent-CAT further submitted that since the petitioner
