defendants for filing the written statement and they were directed to file the written statement on 4.8.2004. The said order reads as under ... written statement. Once the Court had granted time to file the written statement, the presumption would be in favor of the order of the court
when party fails to present written statement called for by Court.- Where any party from whom a written statement is required under rule ... filing the written statement. No irreparable prejudice will be caused to the interest of the plaintiff if the written statement filed by the defendant
filing the written
statement is condoned. The written statement to the
counter claim of the plaintiff which has already been
filed, is ordered ... delay in filing the Written
Statement. The reasons, as already noticed, were that by a bona fide
mistake the Written Statement was not filed within
defendant sought further time to file the written statement which was granted but the written statement could not be filed within the time granted ... condone the delay and permit the written statement already filed to be taken on record. The written statement is on record of the judicial file
filing the written statement and the written statement to the counter-claim of the plaintiff was filed on 19th May, 2004. In order to make ... filing the written statement is condoned. The written statement to the counter claim of the plaintiff which has already been filed, is ordered
open to the defendant to amend his written
statement under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC by taking a
contrary stand than what was stated originally ... Supreme Court had held that an order refusing
amendment of written statement at the time of framing of issues
would certainly not be a purely
time to the petitioner to file written statement by 30th August, 1999. On 30th August, 1999, no written statement was filed. Thus, the Court imposed ... further time to file written statement on 29.9.1999. Still the petitioner failed to file written statement. As the written statement was not filed again costs
Court.
Compliance with proviso to Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC within one week.
Order dusty.
Besides filing written statement to the plaint and reply ... Pass such other and further orders in the circumstances and facts of the case.
In the written statement filed on behalf of the defendant preliminary
trial Court directing defendants to file written statement without deciding the application under Order 7 Rule 11 was contrary to the scheme of the Code ... written statement would be wholly irrelevant at that stage, therefore, a direction to file the written statement without deciding the application under Order 7 Rule
have also been raised in the written statement. However, they are not necessary to be noticed in this order for the purposes of dealing ... have also taken certain preliminary objections in the written statement. In order to avoid any technical objection being raised in certain paragraphs of the suit
