State vs . Sandeep @ Raju Etc Fir 475/13 ... on 7 April, 2018
implication of accused persons in this case and their doubtful chance
identification by the complainant smacks of suspicion.
23. The defence pointed out that Police
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15368 (2.97 seconds)Asharfi And Anr. vs The State on 19 May, 1960
judgment:
"The proper way to hold identification proceedings is to put up each suspect separately for identification mixed with as large a number ... prominent marks require concealment so as to obviate all chance of identification being made through such marks being described to the witnesses earlier.
But surely
State Of Andhra Pradesh vs K. Venkata Reddy & Others on 26 March, 1976
opinion, so far as A-7 is concerned, chances of mistake in
identification by these witnesses were extremely remote.
Mr. Gobind Das, Counsel ... identified A-7, dispels any
suspicion of such identification being a chance
identification. In the witness-box, at the trial, however,
P.W. 9 specifically
Dhan Singh And Others vs State Of U.P. on 5 March, 2020
makes the prosecution story unbelievable. It is also emphasized that since this identification and arrest is a very relevant fact, on the basis of which ... appellants is closely connected to the one about the manner of identification and arrest. It is about recovery of some case property and the weapon
In Re: Narayan Singh Amar Singh And Ors. vs Unknown on 24 April, 1965
mixing the accused with sufficient number of other persons to eliminate chance, identification, by mixing the accused with persons of the same race, culture ... been conducted bona fide with reasonable prudence to eliminate chances of false or mistaken identification, it ought to be accepted. To hold that
Manik vs The State Of Maharashtra on 25 September, 2024
whose record slips would not
have been available, there was no chance of identification
of dead body”, the trial Court further held thus in
paragraph ... Shama @ Kalya being a criminal, there would not
have been any chance of identification of the dead body.
In such circumstances when once identification
Jang Singh And Ors. vs State Of Rajasthan on 7 December, 1983
test identification parade. There is nothing to suggest that the test identification was not conducted in a fair manner. Since the test identification was conducted ... identified by as many as four witnesses, the element of chance identification is not there. After the test identification he was taken back
State vs Mahesh on 18 July, 2013
State vs Mahesh on 18 July, 2013
IN THE COURT OF SHRI SANJEEV KUMAR: ADDITIONAL
State vs Ghanshyam Dass on 24 July, 2025
over to the said police official. Now,
with regard to the chance identification of the Accused in the MACT cell, stated
State vs Kawar Ramesh Singh on 24 April, 2012
police station on 18.04.2004 is presently
described as chance identification. It can not be said at this
Crl. Rev. No. 290/2011 State Vs. Kawar