cursory
examination of the material recorded a finding that the charge was
groundless. The facts that, by order dated 17 th July 2017, the learned ... would be justified in framing the charge. Conversely, if the
material indicates that the charge is wholly groundless, an order for
discharge under section
material to frame
charge against the applicant. In the totality of the circumstances, the charge
against the applicant appears to be groundless.
Hence, the following
applicant, in
the backdrop of the aforesaid facts was urged to be groundless and
unworthy of acceptance, ex-facie.
10. In order to lend support ... material on record indicates that the charge against the applicant
cannot be said to be groundless. On the contrary, if the averments in
the application
were ill-treating her and, thus, there was
suffcient material to frame charge against the applicants are
neither borne out by the record nor satisfy ... learned
Counsel for the applicants to demonstrate that the charge
against the applicants is wholly groundless.
6/14
::: Uploaded on - 16/11/2019 ::: Downloaded
application
holding, inter-alia, that the charge against the respondent
Nos.2 to 4 was groundless. To arrive at the said finding,
the learned Additional ... justified in recording a
finding that the charge against the respondent Nos.2 to 4 is
groundless.
14. Hence, in exercise of revisional jurisdiction
After completion of investigation, charge-sheet came to be
2/11
::: Uploaded on - 13/12/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 15/12/2019 01:52:37 :::
CRIREVNAPPLN ... connect the accused with the crime.
Resultantly, the charge against the applicant was groundless.
4. The prosecution resisted the application.
5. The learned Special Judge
conclusion of the investigation or,
for that matter, framing of the charge against the accused for
the offence punishable under Sections ... therein,
it was urged that the charge under Section 304-B of the Penal
Code becomes totally groundless.
13. In the light of the aforesaid
CRIREVN372-18.DOC
prosecution of the applicant is wholly groundless and, therefore,
the applicant deserves to be discharged.
9. In opposition to this ... there is
suffcient material against the applicant to warrant the framing
of charge. It was further urged that in exercise of the revisional
jurisdiction, which
