opportunity of being heard, the
Magistrate considers the charge against the accused to
be groundless, he shall discharge the accused, and
record his reasons ... under Section 239 of the
Cr.P.C, holding that the charge was groundless. The
complainant questioned that order before the Revisional
Court which directed
opportunity of being
heard, the Magistrate considers the charge against the
accused to be groundless, he shall discharge the
accused, and record his reasons ... under Section 239 of the Cr.P.C, holding that the charge
was groundless. The complainant questioned that
order before the Revisional Court which directed
opportunity of being
heard, the Magistrate considers the charge against the
accused to be groundless, he shall discharge the
accused, and record his reasons ... under Section 239 of the Cr.P.C, holding that the charge
was groundless. The complainant questioned that
order before the Revisional Court which directed
opportunity of being
heard, the Magistrate considers the charge against the
accused to be groundless, he shall discharge the
accused, and record his reasons ... under Section 239 of the Cr.P.C, holding that the charge
was groundless. The complainant questioned that
order before the Revisional Court which directed
recorded by it and only if it considers the
charge against the accused to be groundless. Section
240 of the Code provides for framing ... under Section 239 of the Cr.P.C, holding that the
charge was groundless. The complainant questioned
that order before the Revisional Court which directed
opportunity of being
heard, the Magistrate considers the charge against the
accused to be groundless, he shall discharge the
accused, and record his reasons ... under Section 239 of the Cr.P.C, holding that the charge
was groundless. The complainant questioned that
order before the Revisional Court which directed
opportunity of being
heard, the Magistrate considers the charge against the accused
to be groundless, he shall discharge the accused, and record
his reasons ... under Section 239 of the Cr.P.C, holding that the
charge was groundless. The complainant questioned that order
before the Revisional Court which directed
opportunity of being
heard, the Magistrate considers the charge against the
accused to be groundless, he shall discharge the
accused, and record his reasons ... under Section 239 of the Cr.P.C, holding that the charge
was groundless. The complainant questioned that
order before the Revisional Court which directed
