cheque cannot be distinguished from a cheque
which was not presented at all as mentioned in aforesaid judgment. Hence
merely by presenting the stale cheque ... differentia between the case of a cheque
having not been presented at all or a cheque having become outdated/stale,
for the purposes of demand
cheque in question was
31.03.2018 and the date upon which it was presented was of year 2020. Therefore, the
cheque in question was an outdated ... taken a defence that the cheque in question is an
invalid/outdated cheque on account of merger between the State bank of Patiala and
State
Communication dated 27.07.2016 and 13.09.2016
replacing the outdated cheque as Ex.CW1/9(OSR)
and Ex.CW1/10(OSR);
(i) Cheque bearing
Communication dated 27.07.2016 and 13.09.2016 AAKASH
SHARMA
Date:
replacing the outdated cheque
Communication dated 27.07.2016 and 14.09.2016
replacing the outdated cheque as Ex.CW1/9 (OSR)
and Ex.CW1/10(OSR);
(i) Cheque bearing
Communication dated 27.07.2016 and 14.09.2016
replacing the outdated cheque as Ex.CW1/9 (OSR)
and Ex.CW1/10 (OSR);
(j) Cheque bearing ... drawer of the cheque and in
the circumstance stated above if the cheque
is presented and dishonoured, the holder of
the cheque/drawee would have
AAKASH
SHARMA
Date: 2024.08.01
16:01:18 +0530
replacing the outdated cheque ... drawer of the cheque and in
the circumstance stated above if the cheque
is presented and dishonoured, the holder of
the cheque/drawee would have
Communication dated 27.07.2016 and 14.09.2016
replacing the outdated cheque as Ex.CW1/9 and
Ex.CW1/10;
(i) Cheque bearing
Communication dated 27.07.2016 and 14.09.2016
replacing the outdated cheque as Ex.CW1/9 and
Ex.CW1/10;
(i) Cheque bearing
Communication dated 27.07.2016 and 14.09.2016
replacing the outdated cheque as Ex.CW1/9(OSR)
and Ex.CW1/10(OSR);
(i) Cheque bearing