face of the cheque. On the very next day of the expiry
date, it becomes a stale cheque. When the cheque date ... considered as stale cheque. Even the computer
system of bank does not recognize the said cheque as a
stale cheque. The reason for dishonor which
cheque for
10 Crl.A.No.125/2019
'insufficient funds' but not for stale cheque. Hence, the
cheque is not outdated cheque ... date of the cheque. Further, on perusal
of the endorsement, it is clear that the cheque was not
dishonoured for stale cheque but it was dishonoured
outdated /stale. It was not
presented before the bank within three months from the date of
its issuance. The dishonour of an outdated/stale cheque ... bank within three months
excluding the date of drawing of the cheque. The cheque was to
be presented before the drawee bank on or before
failed to raise the issue with respect to the subject cheque being
stale/outdated before the learned Trial Court. It is further submitted
that there ... Appellant based on the subject cheque. The said
cheque was returned unpaid by the bank with an endorsement
„instrument outdated/stale‟. It is the contention
passed the cheque to 2nd respondent bank the next
day, the 91st day as a result that, R2 dishonored the cheque ... slip
dated 08.11.2016 on the ground 'Stale/outdated cheque'.
4. It is the petitioner's case that the cheque had been presented
CRLMB-16061/2019]
complainant and he had given outdated cheque to the
complainant. The said cheque was dishonoured. After that,
petitioner ... Lacs) from the complainant. He had
given outdated cheque of SBBJ Bank, Jaipur to the complainant.
Petitioner very well knew that SBBJ Bank, Jaipur
certificate (Annexure P-7) has
been given which indicates that the cheque was outdated.
The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that ... parties.
On a consideration of facts, it becomes clear that the cheque
became outdated on 27.10.2006, which however, was presented on
28.10.2006 to the collecting
cheque after forging the signatures of the petitioner in his
bank account which was closed way back in 2013 so if the
cheque ... petitioner and
the respondent and the respondent had used outdated
cheque which apparently stolen by the respondent after
forging the signature of the petitioner
rent of chief tenant than why he filed the case for outdated cheque case. 2- Date of knowledge and cause of action shown
cheque of Rs. 2,00,000/ by putting date of
14.02.2012 with the intention to defraud the complainant. When the
said cheque was presented before ... India, it was
dishonored with the endorsement that it was an outdated cheque.
According to the complainant, he had thereafter requested the
accused
