Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

G.Rajendra vs Smt.G.Nalini on 26 August, 2020 1 OS.No.5607/2003

S.Ravikumar vs Govindareddy on 6 January, 2021 1 OS.No.9893/2006 IN THE

plaintiff ought to have disclosed and put this property in the hotchpotch along with Schedule 'A' property and sought for an equitable partition ... Grama, entire joint family properties have not been brought into the common hotchpotch. It is further contended by the defendant No.8 that the said

A.M.Sridhar vs A.B.Surya on 20 March, 2020 IN THE COURT OF

properties of the joint family are brought to the common hotchpotch, the partial partition in respect of two items of the properties cannot be made

partition all the family properties should be brought in to common hotchpotch along with necessary parities. On perusal of material available on record indicates that

partition, has to bring all the available family properties into a common hotchpotch. In this case except Sy.No.209 measuring 1 acre 4 guntas ... sharers regarding not bringing any particular properties of the family into common hotchpotch for partition. 14. The plaintiffs contended that during the lifetime of their

Smt.N.Mangala Gowramma vs Sri.Nanjappa on 11 September, 2019 IN THE COURT OF

blending applies where a coparcener throws self-acquired property into the common hotchpotch or where acquisitions are traced to joint nucleus. On balance of probabilities

entire Joint family properties have not been brought into the common hotchpotch, and therefore the suit is 21 OS No.25873/2012 ... that the defendant No.1 is also entitled to his common share and also the rents equally in the suit schedule properties. So also