recent survey entry in the Khatiyan with regard to
the suit plots and have wrongly disbelieved the case of the
defendants on that score. Elaborating ... predecessor in interest in partition. The
suit plots are the parts of the property belonging to the common
ancestor Gauri Sah is not in dispute
whether
after hearing the owners of the plot in question who are said to have
inherited the plot from Ragho Mahto, they have been dispossessed ... parties for
taking recourse to the common law remedy of seeking injunction and
declaration of title over the plots in question. This having not been
adjacent land to each other, inasmuch as,
all the plots are separated having no common boundary.
Admittedly, the petitioner has no grievance with regard ... offered are separated, not adjacent to each
other having no common boundary, inasmuch as, he has given the
land is not his land
Additional Member, Board of
Revenue, Bihar by the above stated common order. Since common
question of law and fact are involved in all the aforesaid ... raiyat of the aforesaid plots but respondent no. 10 and 11
being owner of the aforesaid plots transferred the said plots in favour
Additional Member, Board of
Revenue, Bihar by the above stated common order. Since common
question of law and fact are involved in all the aforesaid ... raiyat of the aforesaid plots but respondent no. 10 and 11
being owner of the aforesaid plots transferred the said plots in favour
Additional Member, Board of
Revenue, Bihar by the above stated common order. Since common
question of law and fact are involved in all the aforesaid ... raiyat of the aforesaid plots but respondent no. 10 and 11
being owner of the aforesaid plots transferred the said plots in favour
Patna High Court CWJC No.17192 of 2008
4/11
already sold plot no. 283 and 284 to Akal Mahto @ Akal Gope by
executing registered ... ground that the aforesaid plots were originally recorded
in the name of Kaushal Bhooiya, who transferred the aforesaid plots
to Akal Mahto @ Akal Gope
dated 12.03.1984 by which khata no. 77 plot no. 568 area
7 decimal and khata no. 79 plot no. 584 area 3.5 decimal has
been ... other analogous cases with
regard to khata no. 84 plot no. 470.
17. The defendant no. 5 has also produced 9 witnesses.
Patna High Court
Girdhari Yadav & Anr vs The State Of Bihar on 4 February, 2017
Author: Aditya
Anirudh Yadav vs The State Of Bihar on 4 February, 2017
Author: Aditya Kumar Trivedi
